Dropping the Add System

The~Grim · Post by **The~Grim** » 07 May 2004 15:33

no way

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 07 May 2004 15:52

Nice Grim

Is a pixie of nuclear set easier? hey are worth the same amount of adds.
Is a rev. swirling toe stall (nice trick max!) or ripwalk easier? The Swirling toe stall is 2 adds, ripwalk is 4. Hmm.

ShredStylez · Post by **ShredStylez** » 07 May 2004 18:04

dropping the adds system is a terrible idea, and i also think adds based on anything else besides components would be useless.

adds are what set footbag apart from any other sports. and besides that would erradicate many terms/ lingo used in the sport along with the excitement that comes along with hitting a new 6.

ninja · Post by **ninja** » 08 May 2004 02:46

Whos to say how difficult a move is but how bout just having something to increase the difficulty of a move. eg. swirling toe stall 2 adds +2difficulty to make it 4 adds. You could have +1difficulty, +2, +3,+4 etc. I dunno doesnt sound to good but if u want the add system to show difficulty something like this would work.

ptaku · Post by **ptaku** » 08 May 2004 05:31

ninja: I think that youre idea is imposible to application.
Hoow will be define how many dificult points should a move be? And they should describe it for every posible move, and they must make this objectively. This is just unreal.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 08 May 2004 15:58

Adding difficulty points is like admitting the add system is screwed, but not willing to change it.

ninja · Post by **ninja** » 08 May 2004 18:03

it was just and idea. Didnt say it was a good one. And yes like I said "Whos to say how difficult a move is". Well you can change the add system, get rid of it all together, wateva.

Dropping the Add System

Dump the add system?