Blurry Dyno?

Shredster · Post by **Shredster** » 23 Sep 2005 17:16

Yeah, I think blurry is totally acceptable as stepping farside. Furious is acceptable as barraging farside as well I think. Dyno is rev whirling osis, LIKE a reverse blender, but nowhere close.

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 23 Sep 2005 22:44

AllanHaggett wrote:
Jeremy wrote:Bascially originally in footbag "blurry" meant any move with two in to out dexes - one on each foot. Possibly the first one had to be an op in dex but that's unclear - so blurry was not by any means - stepping pdx.
Not disagreeing with you, but I was just curious where you got this info ...

Kenny Shults wrote it all up on this forum when he used to post here.

edit: didn't read Cameron's post - he answered much better than I did

hackeysnacker · Post by **hackeysnacker** » 23 Nov 2005 15:44

stepping paradox dyno.. isn't that really just a stepping refraction?

sampotter · Post by **sampotter** » 23 Nov 2005 16:40

Go Jane!

james_dean · Post by **james_dean** » 23 Nov 2005 19:36

hackeysnacker wrote:stepping paradox dyno.. isn't that really just a stepping refraction?

Nope. Firstly, it isn't paradox. Secondly... refraction is hippy and involves no osis, dyno is leggy and ends in osis.

hackeysnacker · Post by **hackeysnacker** » 23 Nov 2005 19:53

so then it's all in the style u dex the bag? can u do refraction from op toe/clipper in that case? this doesn't seem to add up

james_dean · Post by **james_dean** » 23 Nov 2005 20:10

Yes, but the style completely changes the trick. There are numerous tricks which have the same jobs notation, but are completely different.

i.e. Quantum symple Butterfly vs DaDaCurve
or Quantum op Legover vs DLO

A butterfly type dex and a reverse whirl type dex are very different. As is ending in an osis and ending in a bit of a spin into a clipper.